Now we’re getting somewhere. That the invitation was for others wasn’t clear. NOW I get where you’re coming from.
But let me clarify one point—
If you (anyone) agrees with the points and their correlations in the context of the conversation/essay, then it follows you agree with the conclusion.
Context is king. It should always be considered as it frames the point of view and short circuits specious arguments.
Sorry if that last response came off harsh. But then, there’s always the potential for that when there’s a misunderstanding … ergo my request for clarification.